On 27/09/2007, Armed Blowfish <diodontida.armata(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
On 26/09/2007, Andrew Gray <shimgray(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Well, no, that's not what he said at all. But
thank-you for proving his
point.
Well, if you do not think Wikipaedia
should be called an attack site, I
assume you will yourself refrain from
calling WR, WT, WW, and ED attack
sites?
I wonder why you're challenging me to agree to stop doing something
I'm not (and something I couldn't care much less about, for that
matter). One has to wonder if you actually read the content of this
mailing list, or just skim it looking for comments you could use to
launch off on tangents about your own pet topics from...
Please, for the love of peace and quiet, will you stop kicking up a
vast amount of noise to satisfy your own self-importance, and let us
get on with doing some work? There used to be actual discussions here
that didn't promptly devolve into nonsense about privacy, ramblings
about banning, and other thoroughly unrelated crap, you know.
Somewhere or another, we may even have touched on an encyclopedia for
more than three messages at a time.
I miss it. There are times this sad state of affairs makes it seem
worth throwing in the towel on three years of work and taking up
carpentry, just to get away from the sheer navel-gazing futility of it
all. Come on, people, we can do better than this.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk