On 24/09/2007, Kat Walsh
<mindspillage(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/24/07, cohesion
<cohesion(a)sleepyhead.org> wrote:
I am very familiar with your argument, but reject
it. We can give
equal priority to both. Things we do should support a "free
encyclopedia". Both. If there is something we are thinking about doing
that fails either of those, for example becoming a free travel website
or becoming a non-free encyclopedia we should reject it. A red ball is
both a ball, and red. There is no choosing.
Thank you.
Free over encyclopaedia, then.
How about encyclopedia over free, but with the less-free stuff marked in
such a way that it's easy for a downstream user to choose to strip the
less-free stuff out in an automated manner? That way you _can_ have both
cake and the eating thereof.