On 9/17/07, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 18/09/2007, InkSplotch <inkblot14(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
The best faith interpretation I can come up with
is someone
stringently fighting cruft.
Not exactly. More like perceived commercial spam.
I think there is an excess of paranoia about commercial spam. Most
such articles are harmless and easily made NPOV, provided enough
information is available.
-Matt