Your reply
further establishes my point: Apparently many Wikipedians
can't even recognize when their own data is astonishingly wrong. ;)
Look carefully. The site claims that edit was made two years prior to
when it actually was.
Perhaps it's more obvious from this history view of the page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/L…
Or do you just not believe in causality?
Ah, I didn't even look at the date. I assumed you were saying
something about the content of the edit, sorry. That was, quite
clearly, a temporary glitch in the servers somewhere. Occasional
mistakes do not make a source unreliable - no source is perfect.
Wikis are, by Wikipaedia's own definition, self-published
and therefore unreliable, especially when it comes to
negative info on living persons.