On 10/09/2007, Wily D <wilydoppelganger(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 9/8/07, Stephen Bain <stephen.bain(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Edit warring can be hard to define, but
that's the reason for having
the 3RR - it's a nice clear rule with only a few clear exceptions
(although the exceptions have been getting bloated again recently,
time to give it another spring cleaning methinks) so that anyone who
breaks it will get blocked.
--
Stephen Bain
stephen.bain(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Can I just ask: The Danzig people voted -- voted -- themselves immune
to 3RR and I was the only one who raised a stink? Whiskey Tango
Foxtrot? Vandalism, liability issues (like libel and personal
attacks) is all I see justification for.
Wikipedia is breaking up into self-controlled sub-units quickly hey.
Next thing we know WikiProjects will be starting up their own
arbitration systems! Now that will be the end. Someone with intimate
knowledge of a topic judging on it! I say its a great system in some
ways that the contributors to a page did something out of process.
Makes me believe in a workable community based project yet again.
Peter