Brock Weller wrote:
All of them from what i've seen. I pointed out
several that they fail,
you are more them welcome to read the rest of the thread if you desire
to participate.
On 9/9/07, Rich Holton <richholton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Brock Weller wrote:
>> Unencyclopedic crap is cut all the time. If it doesn't meet our goals
>> its dropped, nothing against the contributer, but it doesn't fit. We
>> make subjective judgements all the time, and establish standards to
>> help us decide in the future. Our standards on notability are largely
>> subjective, as are our standards on what are reliable sources. These
>> trivia sections don't meet our content criteria and we've been
>> stripping them for months. Thats a functional consensus there. And it
>> appears far from being the consensus against it that you'd need at
>> this stage of the purge.
>>
> *Which* trivia sections don't "meet our content criteria"? All of
them?
> And whose content criteria are you referring to?
>
> -Rich
>
I have been following the thread, and I don't see how you can possibly
make a blanket statement that all trivia sections don't meet "our"
criteria. And I notice that you didn't answer who "our" refers to.
-Rich