On 9/9/07, Brock Weller <brock.weller(a)gmail.com> wrote:
There is not any sort of cabal. You want these types
of discussions
more open, while there's another thread attacking us for making the
same kind of discussions easier to find and saying it ruins
reputations. The majority of users understand how the wiki works, and
a minority just see conspiracies and cabals.
The fact that some discussions are kept easy to find so as to ruin
people's reputations while other discussions are kept top-secret so as
to protect other people's reputations seems to me to be problematic in
and of itself. Why the double-standard?