Bryan Derksen
As I said, it's not specifically developers that I'm blaming here. It
seems to be a system-wide thing.
>From my point of view, the holdup _should_ be to not kill the goose that
> laid the golden egg (wide open editing) - lets be very very careful with
> what gets tinkered with.
If stable versions turns out to be a disaster for some reason it should
be perfectly straightforward to just turn it off
again.
from User:Jimbo Wales/Statement of principles: Any changes to the software
must be gradual and reversible. Great minds think alike :)
There is abundant consensus to implement 'stable versions', but not much of
a definition of what exactly a 'stable version' is. I think there is a real
operatunity here for the leadership to run a few trials and try a few
things. Hell, here is the perfect opperatunity to go begging on our hands
and knees to User:Worldtraveller to return to the project for some
consulting.