On 9/7/07, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If people/bots are doing that, they should be
stopped. Last time I
read the appropriate policy it said to integrate trivia into the rest
of the article, not remove it.
Yeah, trivia sections are "good" in the sense that we can quickly
identify material that needs a better home. Of course, sometimes the
material just seems too tangential to rescue.
I'm not opposed to trivia
sections, and perhaps it is that tangentiality
that justifies having such material in a separate section rather than
having it integrated into the body of the article where its appearance
may sometimes seem strained.
Ec