On 02/09/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I'd rather not post a list of those on mod as
it may
seem like
personal black marks against them.
If you show such consideration on the list, which
does not have particularly high Google rankings,
why should it bother you if someone asks for
blocked and banned editors to be shown
similar consideration on Wikipaedia, which does
have very high Google rankings?
I agree with Blowfish & Riddel on this.
Those "moderated"/blocked on Wikipedia and the other wikis
are openly known and available for anybody, not just users.
Saying the mail moderation list is private is, beside
inconsistent and contrary to the otherwise open policy,
bordering on stupid CYA antics.
I could understand if it's a size issue. Couldn't that be
resolved via dumping it into a compressed file and posting
it to media?
~~Pro-Lick
(Wikia supported site since 2006)
--spam may follow--
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers
- Check it out.