The Foundation
is generally very good, but I'd just like some formal
restrictions in place (and more accountability to the community).
The board of trustees can't reasonably be expected to be restricted by
what they can or cannot do (except by law) in the interest of the
charity. The members by law have to put the charity interest first and
foremost, even if it means possibly going against the wises / view of
the wider membership. The membership can of course decide to remove the
board / member(s) though.