Just speaking for myself, I would not have bothered
with using AFC as an
anon. You can't really draw firm conclusions from AFC about the entire
population of anon editors because it's self-selecting - those who *really*
want an article, as opposed to those who casually think "Hey, I could start
a one-para article on this thing I know" are probably more inclined to use
AFC. Unsurprisingly, those are the people with vanity, spam, etc. - not
those with useful articles to contribute.
But surely those vanity, spam, etc. anon that *really* want an article
will just create an account to create it in the first place.
Note: I'm all in favour of turning it back on for a month and see how
that goes, so that there is some definitive data to refer to when seeing
which of the two choice is preferable.
KTC
--
Experience is a good school but the fees are high.
- Heinrich Heine