On 20/10/2007, Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
Charlotte Webb wrote:
> Or did you mean "such that the protector
intends for it to remain
> protected until the cows come home?"
> The latter would be, as Anthony has put strikingly into perspective,
> an outrageous alternative to blocking the edit warriors (who will
> undoubtedly reconvene themselves on a different page).
Especially considering that we've got some new
quality control
mechanisms coming down the pipe that may make it even easier to keep
vandals and POV-pushers at bay.
I would assume "indefinite" to mean "indefinite", i.e. without a
fixed
ending date, rather than rather than "forever." The whole point of
the arbcom ruling it was protected under was roving gangs of LaRouche
cultists and their endless arrays of sockpuppets, and what to do about
them.
- d.