[WikiEN-l] Is NPOV non-negotiable? (and if so, why are debating it?)

[Ray Saintonge]

Alec Conroy wrote:
> But that's the impression I'm left with, after reading  the
> discussion.   If NPOV is non-negotiable, why is its application under
> negotiation?  And if a policy or principle comes down which isn't
> consistent with NPOV-- which one should govern?
NPOV should prevail.  The recently claimed conflict is with "No Personal 
Attacks".  It's hard to imagine a personal attack that's neutral.

Ec