Did you read my message? The point is that you cannot simply presume things. Perhaps they
can't use e-mail or create an account elsewhere. Maybe they can.
But the point isn't the technical feasability of creating an account, it's the
image we project of ourselves.
People don't come to this site willing to edit if it's the last thing they do,
they come with the kind of "meh, maybe I'll try this and see how it turns
out" attitude typical of new users to a site. If they have to jump through hoops to
create an account, they won't.
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:41:11 +0100
From: "Thomas Dalton" <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] A2: Blocking of school IPs
To: "English Wikipedia" <wikien-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org>
Message-ID:
<a4359dff0710120741l1aa5d699nf2f4af867a4646d0(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On 12/10/2007, Flameviper Velifang <theflameysnake(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
[[User_talk:216.11.222.21]]
This is absurd.
I recently looked at Wikipedia and saw an unusual amount of IP
blocks, all with
the same reason (vandalism). A large amount of these
blocks were one year, and had the same cookie-cutter message. They also
blocked accounts editing from that address and/or blocked account creation.
Ironic, since the usual response to an IP ban is to
create an
account.
You are simply incorrect. That IP address is "soft-blocked". All you
need to do to edit using it is create an account somewhere else, or
email unblock-en-l and request someone there create an account for
you.
---------------------------------
Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, photos
& more.