"Andrew Gray"
How many of our
contributors are here to write about what they know, not primarily
here to build "an encyclopedia"?
The argument on finitude applies much better to individuals than to the project as a
whole. A natural "encyclopedist" would be someone willing to write stubs, at
least, outside their comfort zone of familiar knowledge. So the point becomes that there
are relatively few of those. Yes, but WP has actually come this far because such people
are many more than Britannica's view would suggest. Professional reference book
writers are not so many, though I did meet one at Wikimania. The issue is of recruiting
and retaining the right people, who can learn on the job. The scope of Wikipedia is not
really the point.
Charles
-----------------------------------------
Email sent from
www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software and scanned for spam