On Oct 12, 2007, at 12:28 PM, Anthony wrote:
> Right, COI editing, POV pushing, sockpuppetry, it's all fine as long
> as it doesn't annoy certain people.
> That's precisely the problem being
pointed out by so many of the so
> called attack sites.
Anthony, you're smarter than this. The message and the mechanism of
its delivery are, in this case, separate. Yes, valid objections can
be raised to things that happen on Wikipedia. No, revealing people's
names, calling their employers, and conspiring to have them thrown
out of school is not a valid way of raising those objections. No, I
(and most other reasonable people) are not inclined to take anything
Brandt says seriously, since he's so utterly discredited himself as a
pernicious fuckwit.
You are smart enough to know this, and so I can only assume you've
returned to needlessly trolling the list. In which case, I feel
obliged to point out the moderation queue in which your messages can
cheerily reside.
-Phil