On 07/10/2007, Adrian <aldebaer(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
With that rationale, why would we need a process where
the community
expresses trust with the tools in the first place? Trust can expire in
cases of prolonged borderline behaviour that ArbCom wouldn't act on. So
you're basically saying: The community is good enough to be called upon
to express their trust initially, but they can never express a change of
heart regarding that trust? Sounds weird.
So you want this for theoretical reasons rather than because of an
actual problem?
- d.