[WikiEN-l] Arbiter involvement on the Durova affair

[jayjg]

On Nov 29, 2007 10:42 PM, Alec Conroy <alecmconroy at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/29/07, joshua.zelinsky at yale.edu <joshua.zelinsky at yale.edu> wrote:
> > Being on a list does not make an arbiter so involved as to need to recuse
> > themselves. If we used that level arbiters would need to recuse themselves so
> > frequently we'd rarely have a quorum.
>
> The double-secrect "investigations" list seems more ambiguous.
> http://lists.wikia.com/mailman/listinfo/wpinvestigations-l

Alec, do you think this deliberately provocative language is helpful?
Moderators, perhaps you could step in.

> I know it
> would radically change how I interact with the project

I see that as a positive thing.