On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:59:54 -0500, "David Goodman"
<dgoodmanny(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I've just now looked at 25 consecutive items up for
speedy. There were:
15 new articles that were valid speedies, and 2 new ones that were not
valid speedies (one probably suitable for deletion via prod or afd),
5 older articles that were valid speedies, and 3 that were not, all
probably suitable for deletion via prod or afd).
OK, but what do we learn form this? What common factors did you
observe in the ones that were not valid? Were there common factors
in the nominator's ID?
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG