Guy Chapman aka JzG schrieb:
Wikipedia is extraordinarily tolerant of dissenting opinion. People
only et banned when they have made heroic efforts to prove beyond
doubt that they are utterly unable to contribute productively.
I doubt that.
In Awbrey's case, the final straw was attempts to
write policy
pages on "expert editors" so as to allow him to continue to add
original research to the article over which he has obsessed ever
since he arrived.
What is so dangerous about s.o. trying to write a new policy?
Did you write on a policy before? If it's crap, it will end
in /dev/null anyway.
No, the only people who need to fear that are the
*already banned*
abusers of the project whose socks we are blocking on an almost
daily basis.
And what kind of magic is involved in finding those socks?
In what way is it different from a witch hunt?
--
Raphael