Maybe we
did, back when we had fewer than two million articles and
fewer than a million users, and were not a top-ten site making us an
essential part of any vanity, spam or POV-pushing campaign.
Why should our behaviour as a top-ten site change from the behaviour
that got us there? The faults that you list did not suddenly spring-up
when we became a top-ten site. They have all scaled up very well, but
that was always predictable.