On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 08:34:38 +1000, "Peter Ansell"
<ansell.peter(a)gmail.com> wrote:
That may be true, but he is being more rational about
the situation
that you are. You seem to be using troll as a category to avoid
discussing the actual issues. At least in the post which started this
thread, he hasn't said anything which pins him down as an irrational
abusive troll. Having a personality clash isn't a good reason for
calling someone a troll.
Um, Flameviper posted a long screed denouncing [[WP:DENY]] as a
steaming pile of crap "because it insists on the existence of
trolls" when in fact it says no such thing. As I pointed out.
So I didn't address the issue he raises because it does not exist.
Actually WP:DENY is much healthier than the long-term abuse pages
ever were. Do we really believe that we do people a service by
immortalising their foolishness? I suspect that many people when
they look back in ten years will be rather glad we WP:DENY rather
than building silly monuments to childish vandalism.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG