On Nov 6, 2007 3:23 PM, <joshua.zelinsky(a)yale.edu> wrote:
[snip]
Now, I have trouble seeing how a vandalism template in
that case was anything
but biting.
I'm sure the person who place the message would be insulted by saying
it was biting. How about... the person just used the wrong template?
What if they had used
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Firstarticle instead?
Is this a case which we could improve by encouraging people to be
careful to use on-target messages?