On 5/21/07, Skyring <skyring(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/22/07, John Lee <johnleemk(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>
> The result is that in many cases, spoiler tags encompass whole
sections of
> articles, even if not really necessary,
simply because someone feels
that
> X
> is a spoiler and should be covered. As someone (I think it was Phil
> Sandifer?) pointed out, in such a case, we might as well mark the
whole
> encyclopaedia with spoiler tags because
virtually every bit of
information
could be
an unwanted surprise to someone.
I'm shocked, shocked to find that infomonging is going on in here!
--
Peter in Canberra
*sigh* No one is suggesting eliminating, or even hiding (as in
invisibility), the spoilers. We just want a little template at the
top.