Bryan Derksen wrote:
You've presented no additional evidence or
reasoning in response to my
question, just repeated yourself and bumped your estimate down another
order of magnitude to one in a million. So now there's only been about
_four registered editors_ in the history of Wikipedia who you think
could be objective about themselves.
This is simply silly, and hardly worth debating any more. You're just
throwing random numbers around.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
As I stated-even if we accept that only 90% of people are incapable of
writing neutrally about themselves, that's a pretty unreliable source.
Would you cite a source in an article that's known to get it wrong 9 of
10 times?