On 11/05/07, Joe Szilagyi <szilagyi(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If I recall correctly, Neil Gaiman for whatever
personal reasons has gone
out of his way to not speak of/about his father generally in public forums.
There's a citation now in Neil's article with comments from David Gaiman,
indicating or at least alluding to Neil being his son. Is that sufficient
for BLP purposes? Or would extra third party verification be needed beyond
that for something that on the surface seems non-controversial, but
apparently is controversial on some level for Neil Gaiman?
Not apparently in Neil Gaiman's mind, and not apparently in David
Gaiman's mind. David Gaiman did tell a newspaper interviewer that he
should speak to his son Neil, who's a famous writer, not to him ...
are there two famous writers called Neil Gaiman?
- d.