On 6/11/07, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/11/07, Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org> wrote:
The first two aren't high enough standards,
in my opinion. The third
one is
talking about article subjects, whereas I was
talking about articles.
Which of the following do you consider a valid article:
fjghoeurghvoirjg[rgj]h
John is gay
Neither, of course.
And the third one is ridiculously vague. What in the
world it's supposed
to
mean to "make any assertion whatsoever as to
why the subject might be
notable" is beyond me. Actually, I do know what it's supposed to mean -
whatever the deleting admin wants it to mean.
Nah. It means rather that "Sally was born in 1992 and attends school
with her gay friend John" can be deleted.
Bad example as that can also be deleted under A1.
"Sally was born in 1992 and
attends school with her gay friend John. She holds the
record for the
most patents filed by a 12 year old" would need a prod, AFD or OFFICE.
What if you don't think holding the record for the most patents filed by a
12 year old makes someone notable? What if you think anyone who holds a
single patent at any age is notable? Seems to me the criterion means
"whatever the deleting admin wants it to mean".