That was hardly my point. There was never any suggestion of abandoning
NPOV. How do you get that from a call for statistical information?
Suggesting that no-one who makes an OTRS complaint is ever successful
stretches credibility.
Ec
Jimmy Wales wrote:
I think the answer, throughout the entire history of
Wikipedia, is 0%
"capitulation".
NPOV is non-negotiable. As ever.
On Jul 8, 2007, at 9:31 AM, Ray Saintonge wrote:
>Kat Walsh wrote:
>
>
>>A lot of people say that every time they hear about OTRS it's because
>>of some big frustrating action. This is largely because the small
>>undramatic actions or the ones where the people writing are told
>>"sorry, we don't do that" -- or the ones where people get into
tense
>>20-message exchanges that amount to "sorry, we don't do that" -- no
>>one hears about those.
>>
>>
>Would it be feasible to periodically publish OTRS statistics?
>Something
>that appears, for example, as 80% refusal, 19% negotiation, 1%
>capitulation could give a clearer picture.
>