On 7/5/07, Daniel R. Tobias <dan(a)tobias.name> wrote:
On 5 Jul 2007 at 21:19:57 +0000, "Fred
Bauder" <fredbaud(a)waterwiki.info> wrote:
Referring to an active remedy as "vague
statements" is essentially a
declaration that she was free to ignore them. A mistake as they remain
valid, although there is some doubt they apply to this particular
edit.
Well, "Ignore All Rules" is an active policy, as is "Be Bold". And
you state yourself that
ArbCom doesn't make policy, and at times appear to believe that the ArbCom ruling in
question doesn't apply to what she did in this case (though you seem to change your
mind on
this as often as the weather changes where I live in South Florida).
Dan, what you see as Fred changing his mind is in fact him expressing
a nuanced view that balances the different concerns. It's perfectly
coherent and very much welcomed.