On 6/30/07, White Cat <wikipedia.kawaii.neko(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 6/30/07, The Mangoe <the.mangoe(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
It is incontrovertibly a reliable source for the
continuing notability
of the incident.
I do not think thats an accurate assessment. Just because
something is
covered, doesn't make it notable. Just as something not covered on media is
not non-notable.
You imply, in saying this, that media coverage is irrelevant to
notability. I say that in general media coverage IS the "noting" that
makes notability. That it is noted is prima facie evidence of
notability.