On 2/26/07, William Pietri <william(a)scissor.com> wrote:
T P wrote:
Not everything in the "Encyclopedia of
Sequential Art" belongs in
Wikipedia.
Would you mind fleshing that out for me? I've just leafed through a
couple special-purpose reference works I have around. I'm not seeing an
obvious dividing line between topics. What would you leave out from
special-purpose encyclopedias? If possible, I'd like a rule that applies
to the Encyclopedia of Western Philosophy just as well as the
Encyclopedia of Fashion Accessories.
It's also be great if you could ground your rule in some practical
reason why it's bad.
I should have been more clear that that is my personal opinion. As I
mentioned in another post, if the Wikipedia community decides, in fact, that
everything included in any encyclopedia belongs in Wikipedia, then that's
fine.
Adam