I hesitate to bring up something that's apparently pretty contentious,
but let me ask one small question.
Rob Smith wrote:
The problem is *why *the Brandt bio was created in the
first place. This
was *before* BLP, and strong evidence exists it was created with malicious
intent to defame Brandt, using a questionable source. This evidence has
been reviewed, presumably at the Foundation level.
Do you feel the current article doesn't meet BLP and other standards?
Thanks,
William
--
William Pietri <william(a)scissor.com>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:William_Pietri