Stephen Bain wrote:
On 2/11/07, stvrtg <stvrtg(a)gmail.com> wrote:
The whole point of CZ is greater reliability,
but:
The article below may contain errors of fact, bias, grammar, etc. The
Citizendium
Foundation and the participants in the Citizendium project make no
representations
about the reliability of this article or, generally, its suitability for
any purpose. We make
this disclaimer of all Citizendium article versions that have not been
specifically approved."
Sort of says it all.
Add it to this list:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Non-Wikipedia_disclaimers
Put Citizendium in that list alongside a whole lot of sources that people
have actually heard of? A list of "places which are often regarded as
reliable"? I think that's giving them a bit more credit than they deserve.
I'm inclined to think that even mentioning them on this list is giving
them more credit than they deserve, but I'll be tolerant for now.
-- Tim Starling