Cheney Shill wrote:
--- Kelly Martin <kelly.lynn.martin(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I've already explained this elsewhere, so
I'll only give a quick
summary here. Wikipedia does something _right_ by letting everyone
edit. The underlying philosophy is that everyone starts out as
innocent
This is equivalent to saying existing users have superior
knowledge to new users.
I'm sorry, I don't understand how.
You're claiming that the same thing you claim is
wrong about the
admin approval, to be suspicious of the admins intent, reliability,
and knowledge, is actually being applied, at the very least, to every
new user.
Well yes... who else do you think it is applied to? Clearly not the
admins :-p
It seems the ruling policy, NPOV, is inherently
suspicious
and it's not really a problem to be suspicious from the
ground up.
I honestly don't see what NPOV has to do with anything in this thread.
What you're saying is not making much sense to me I'm afraid.
Timwi