Ray Saintonge wrote:
Steve Bennett wrote:
I think it ought to be trialled. We're all making a lot of assumptions
about what would happen if paid editing were to occur. Why not do a
trial on a couple of articles, and monitor but not interfere with the
article over a period of a few months?
It would be totally unacceptable to take the position that an article
being worked on by a paid editor could not be edited by anyone else
during that time.
Correct me if I'm wrong, Steve, but I rather assumed "interfere" in this
context meant "block the editors who admit to being paid", not "allow
others to edit the article too".
Personally, I'm rather in favor of such an experiment. It's not as if
it could possibly make things that much worse than they already are.
--
Ilmari Karonen