Yes. Nathan is right that the better strategy is to defend the
existing articles, and so establish that such articles should remain
on wikipedia. A more widespread intelligent selective good-faith
participation in afds is the ordinary wikipedians defense against
cabals.
And the best of all is to improve existing articles so people will be
ashamed even to nominate them--or if they still do, we will establish
a solid pattern of snow keep closes.
On 12/29/07, Nathan <nawrich(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Well, speaking as devil's advocate - what
you're really saying is that
they should be recreated. And perhaps before taking the step of
recreation, it should established that these articles ought to exist
in the first place.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG