Michael Noda wrote:
Lots of WP regulars are over there now, but
they're mostly getting
torn to pieces, because their arguments do boil down to "Bagley's a
sociopath, and you need to trust us on that." Virtually nobody is
backing themselves up with links, like
<http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=382783&cid=21613811> does.
Seriously, folks, it's not just on-wiki that we need to cite our
sources, especially with the PR we've had this last week or two.
*Not* making our critics right about our being arrogant and
unsocialized would be a good thing.
This is why I was suggesting that it'd be really useful to have a page
providing a full account of the situation. Producing a neutral,
verifiable summaries of persons or events is what we're _for_.