On Dec 4, 2007 12:57 PM, Alec Conroy <alecmconroy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
So now it seems we're destine for the latter, and
the best thing we
can do is to let everyone know that the lists exist, and the next time
six peopel show up and agree, don't just automatically assume you got
six independent opinions-- instead consider the possibility that you
got one opinion and five friends.
I'd say a better thing would be to not hold such a huge number of
polls that it canvassing for people to find out about them.
Alternatively, if you insist on having polls for everything, maybe a
random jury selection type system would bring more independent
opinions into place.