On 8/24/07, Eugene van der Pijll <eugene(a)vanderpijll.nl> wrote:
He's also completely right.
No, not in the slightest. He's proposed a hierarchy of ridiculous and
strained interpretations which exceed the boundaries of rational
thought, and which deserved no response. I'm sorry you were suckered
by it.
If you define a "Document" to mean a single
page of Wikipedia,
The document is an article. It spans multiple http fetched pages.
There is nothing surprising about this.
There certainly are some things which are not clear because they are
so far outside of the scope of the language of the license, but thats
not the case for anything mentioned here.