On 23/08/07, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> What criteria for deadminning are you thinking
of? "Unpopular for
> deleting 1000 fair-abuse images" or something that'll be usable for
> that shouldn't be amongst them, for instance.
The same at the criteria for a block. Violating
policy. When such a
violation requires action and what action is required should be at the
discretion of the crat, just as it's at the discretion of the admin
for blocks.
The criterion for a block is actually preventing damage - not
punishment, which is why mere past policy violation isn't reason for a
block and blocks for old 3RRs are ill-favoured.
So presumably de-adminning would also be for prevention of damage.
Examples would be useful as well, so we aren't talking entirely in the
abstract. Probably with names removed.
- d.