Do you have any evidence to support this claim of a reduction in the trust
factor? I only recently (last month or two) began contributing there, and I
see people arguing for or against RFAs specifically with the word trust in
ever RFA.
On 8/22/07, John Lee <johnleemk(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 8/23/07, George Herbert <george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Nobody is currently in the process of standing for adminship on
en.wikipedia ... the last three ran their time and were closed earlier
today.
I don't recall seeing the page empty the entire time I've been here...
* '''Support'''. We don't need new admins. ~~~~ :p
Maybe now somebody will realise that something is fundamentally wrong with
our adminship process. It does not scale; it worked when we were smaller,
but now it seems to me that the old indicators of trustworthiness for
adminship are unreliable; in the first place, the RfA process seems to
diminish the importance of the trust factor, emphasising more the ILIKEIT
and IDONTLIKEIT factors.
Johnleemk
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l