On 8/16/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I'd say that overall we got a pretty good grade. The only guy who was
really critical was the first one. One thing that does seem to crop up
is birthdays (but that's apparently hard for any bibliographic piece
to figure out).
It's always nice when people say "There were a couple of details
wrong, but I love wikipedia and use it all the time!" Like they don't
want to criticise us even though they might have grounds for it :)
--Oskar