On 8/13/07, Armed Blowfish <diodontida.armata(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
On 13/08/07, Andrew Gray
<shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 13/08/07, Armed Blowfish <diodontida.armata(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Okay, so I am banned for using Tor and running a Tor exit node,
right?
> >
> > So can I pretty please qualify for emotional protection under
> > [[Wikipedia:Banning_policy#Dealings_with_banned_users]], where it
> > says, 'Wikipedia's hope for banned users is that they will leave
> > Wikipedia with their pride and dignity intact, whether permanently
or
> for
the duration of their ban. As such, it is inappropriate to bait
> banned users or take advantage of their ban to mock them.'
You're not banned;
The community had a choice - they denied my appeal. However, that's
okay. I got over that part.
Actually, according to what I've read, you withdrew your appeal.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
The appeal == RfA? Or the ipexempt patch?
God this is all so confusing :*(
If it's the RfA, well, there's more to adminship than ipexempt.
And if it's because of the patch - well, that's more of a dev thing than a
community thing.