On 8/13/07, Armed Blowfish <diodontida.armata(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
On 13/08/07, Andrew Gray
<shimgray(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 13/08/07, Armed Blowfish <diodontida.armata(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Okay, so I am banned for using Tor and running a Tor exit node,
right?
> >
> > So can I pretty please qualify for emotional protection under
> > [[Wikipedia:Banning_policy#Dealings_with_banned_users]], where it
> > says, 'Wikipedia's hope for banned users is that they will leave
> > Wikipedia with their pride and dignity intact, whether permanently
or
for the duration of their ban. As such, it is
inappropriate to bait
banned users or take advantage of their ban to mock them.'
You're not banned;
The community had a choice - they denied my appeal. However, that's
okay. I got over that part.
Actually, according to what I've read, you withdrew your appeal.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
The appeal == RfA? Or the ipexempt patch?
God this is all so confusing :*(
If it's the RfA, well, there's more to adminship than ipexempt.
And if it's because of the patch - well, that's more of a dev thing than a
community thing.