On 13/08/07, Anthony <wikimail(a)inbox.org> wrote:
On 8/13/07, Thomas Dalton
<thomas.dalton(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Depends
on what you mean by consensus, of course.
By any realistic meaning of consensus, none has been established.
Point me to a discussion that you believe established a consensus for
the change in policy you are suggesting.
I've heard consensus defined as a majority, and a majority of the
people who commented on AB's RfA, knowing that AB edited through Tor,
suggested that AB should be an admin.
I said "realistic meaning". "consensus==majority" is not realistic.
I've seen "rough consensus" defined as "supermajority" (which is,
for
the most part, the definition used on RfA), but that's as close to
your definition as I've seen.