On 8/5/07, David Goodman <dgoodmanny(a)gmail.com> wrote:
To determine which passages make the grade, the
researchers analyzed
Wikipedia's editing history, tracking material that has remained on
the site for a long time and edits that have been quickly overruled. A
Wikipedian with a distinguished record of unchanged edits is declared
trustworthy, and his or her contributions are left untouched on the
Santa Cruz team's color-coded pages. But a contributor whose posts
have frequently been changed or deleted is considered suspect, and his
or her content is highlighted in orange. (The darker the orange, the
more spurious the content is thought to be.)"
That's nice but for the information to be useful to us they would have
to start naming names.
—C.W.