Can someone please link directly to a current
Wikipedia article, that
should be changed, and list a proper reference to it that is not being
used, to show the damage being done by this fracas to Wikipedia? Just
one example of a specific article, and what should be in it, according
to a highly reliable source--not a dozen, just one.
Like the generalized attack sites version, the harm caused by this is mostly
in the discussion pages, not in the article pages. I hope you are not
claiming that unless it's directly deleted from an article page, it isn't
damage.
I can't claim anything without any basis for understanding, and since
there doesn't seem to be any forthcoming that is a civil presentation
of just what has been done, I'm not claiming anything.
But I don't see how you went from the question I asked to what my
claims might or might not be.