On 8/2/07, Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
Tony Sidaway wrote:
I think that sums up my feelings on this matter,
too. I just cannot
understand why Slim Virgin is being described as "a net detriment to
the project" on account of attacks that are made by *her* by people we
all recognise as either severely unbalanced or having an axe to grind.
It quite disturbing.
It's not SlimVirgin herself that I consider a net detriment, it's all
this effort to suppress discussion of her.
All what "effort"? And when did this become the wikislimvirgin-l
discussion list anyway?
If she herself is not
involved in that (and I'm led to believe that she's not) then I've got
no beef at all with her on this matter.
So when Andrew was asking her (and apparently others) to leave, and
using the word "we", he was just speaking for himself?
BTW, first there was a comparison to appeasing the
Nazis, now we've got
a comparison to rape. This is a bit over the top, IMO.
This whole discussion is a bit over the top, including the bit about
"censorship".