Tony Sidaway wrote:
On 4/25/07, Jeff Raymond
<jeff.raymond(a)internationalhouseofbacon.com> wrote:
Best-case scenario is yes, merge. Obviously, a
"criticism of GWB" article
that may exist is going to have difficulty being merged when the main
article is already 70kb long, but there's no reason not to take this on a
case by case basis, assuming good sourcing.
Why is "criticisms of Uri Geller" (or whoever) a valid encyclopedic
subject? Would we accept an article called "instances of undiluted
praise of Uri Geller"?
I don't know, would we? Criticism of cranks is a very valid topic and
very accepted situation in society.
We're supposed to adopt the neutral point of view, so it would be
"evaluations of X".
It's not difficult to be neutral about a subject, even if that subject
is inherently negative.
-Jeff
--
Name: Jeff Raymond
E-mail: jeff.raymond(a)internationalhouseofbacon.com
WWW:
http://www.internationalhouseofbacon.com
IM: badlydrawnjeff
Quote: "I was always a fan of Lisa Loeb, particularly
because you kind of get the impression she
sang every song either about or to her cats.
They seem to be the driving force in most of
her creative process." - Chuck Klosterman